Talk:Unused Pokémon design revealed in magazine interview: Difference between revisions
From Bulbanews, your community Pokémon newspaper.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Swagmander (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=The reason why there aren't 650?= | =The reason why there aren't 650?= | ||
Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some.-- [[User:Swagmander|Swagmander]] 03:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some.-- [[User:Swagmander|Swagmander]] 03:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
Shouldn't it say "that sparked interest in the" you left out "in". | |||
Revision as of 15:06, 9 February 2011
The reason why there aren't 650?
Could this scrapped Pokémon design be the reason why there are 649 Pokémon, and not an even 650? It's kind of a shame in my opinion. They've gotten away with plenty of controversial Pokémon in the past, even Generation V had some.-- Swagmander 03:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't it say "that sparked interest in the" you left out "in".
